22.9 C
Nairobi
Friday, April 26, 2024

Business Boycott: Are Kenyan businesses on trial?

On

Related stories

Mombasa Tycoon mourned by his two wives as each wife publishes own obituary on Daily Nation

The passing of Mombasa-based engineer Kata Matemu has become...

HMD launches first Original Collection – Finger on The Pulse

Tech innovator Human Mobile Devices (HMD) has today revealed...

Naiboi resurfaces years after unfollowing everyone on Instagram

Fans of the artist NaiBoi have bombarded him with...

Harnessing Insurance to forge common ground in Human-Wildlife Conflict Resolution

By Francis Maina Addressing human-wildlife conflict (HWC) has been a...

NCBA Financial inclusion in East Africa Region through launch of NCBA Now App

NCBA Group has unveiled its innovative banking omnichannel application,...

On November 4, the National Super Alliance (Nasa) asked their supporters to boycott products from three leading Kenyan companies, Brookside, Safaricom and Bidco. The opposition coalition accused these three firms of ‘perpetrating electoral injustices’!. This is contrary to the situation 10 years ago when the private sector played  a key role is facilitating dialogue between opposing political groups of Party of National Unity (PNU) and Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) which brought an end to Kenya’s worst post election violence and formation of the coalition government.

Since Nasa made their pronouncement, the business fraternity and the general Kenyan consumers have been left wondering the basis in which the three companies were singled out. To begin with, Safaricom was accused of transmitting ‘doctored’ election results in the presidential election held on August 8 2017. The opposition, though, failed to table any evidence showing that Safaricom had conspired to transmit flawed results at the Supreme Court, or publicly before the media. Brookside on the other hand was accused of supporting the Jubilee government. The obvious fact, though, is that Brookside was singled out because it is owned by the Kenyatta family.

Read: Kenya improves in World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business index

The biggest question, though, is why Bidco Africa was singled out. Could it be that  Bidco was targeted because of its Chief Executive Officer Vimal Shah’s role in business advocacy in the country and particularly because of his role as a past chairman of  the Kenya Private Sector Alliance (KEPSA)?

Private sector and devolution

Mr. Shah was first elected as the KEPSA chairman in April 2013 while serving as the chairman of Kenya Manufacturers Association (KMA). He succeeded Eng. Patrick Obath who served as KEPSA chair for two years, with Mr. Shah serving as his deputy. While electing Mr. Shah to this position, KEPSA also launched the National Business Agenda II. This was a blue-print that formed the basis of advocacy to improve the business environment in the private sector over the next five years to 2017.

With devolved governments coming into play, Mr. Shah assumed the chairmanship of KEPSA at a time when the private sector was seeking ways of tapping investment opportunities in the devolved units. Indeed, over this period, KEPSA has been central in  obtaining investment pledges that have been made over the last five years in multiple county investment fora. These counties have been made in various counties across the country regardless of their political persuasion. “This means that the main business for either KEPSA of the KEPSA chair has not been to subjugate the political alignment of any region, but to ensure that local businesses have access to business opportunities across the political divide,” says financial analyst, Eliud Okoth.

Conducive environment for business

Granted that a hostile political environment is a hindrance to investments and businesses, the private sector has consistently over the years advocated for socially and politically conducive business environments. The call for peace or stability for the sake of investments and businesses, though, is neither an endorsement of a present regime nor a castigation of the opposition.

Vimal Shah
Vimal Shah

In 2014, for example, Mr. Shah, leading the Kenya Private Sector Alliance had acknowledged that while Kenya was facing a raft of socio-economic changes, there was a need for all political, social and economic players to engage using alternative avenues as opposed to chaotic demonstrations by the opposition and counter demonstrations by pro-government supporters that not only further polarized the country, but put off potential investors.

In 2016, KEPSA cautioned that just like many previous elections, the 2017 General Elections would see a slowdown in investments, especially if the political environment turned hostile. “It is just another election but the impact of an election is so important. To the public, it is a time to slowdown,” said Mr. Shah, adding that there was a need for the public and private sector players to ensure that there economic stability prevailed. “This was an acknowledgement that businesses bleed the same way regardless of their owners’ social, economic or political affiliation,” says Mr. Okoth. Certainly, this measure of caution may not have augured well with the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD), which at the time was holding weekly demonstrations at Nairobi’s Central Business District calling for the removal of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) commissioners.

Private sector advocacy

As predicted by local business leaders, among them Bidco’s Shah, the country has been facing a serious disruption of economic activities both in the public and private sectors since the August elections. This has not only concerned the business advocacy group, Mkenya Daima Initiative which is chaired by Bidco’s Shah. For instance, the Kenya National Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KNCCI), just like KEPSA has been pushing for a quick return to normalcy and an end to disruption of business activities. “The first half of the year has been a wait-and-see period. Most businesses will be shut for a week. Yet we’re in the second half of the year. We may end up strangling the economy and productivity,” says KNCCI chairman Kiprono Kittony, adding that due to past incidents, there’s a justification for business owners to be worried.

Read: 7 interesting facts about business tycoon, Chris Kirubi

The big question then is: how does such business and investment by either KEPSA or KNCCI translate to an undermining of electoral processes? Why should Bidco, which employs thousands of Kenyans from varying political persuasions, be subjected to political crucifixion over a matter way beyond its reach based on non-proven allegations? At a time when the country direly needs investments and more job opportunities, politically allocating blame and accusations to companies without tabling sufficient and unbiased evidence is the last thing the economy needs.

For instance, when it started out over 30 years ago, Bidco was a manufacturing company. Today, not only has it put thousands of Kenyans on pay roll, but also provided thousands of secondary jobs through its edible oils, cooking fats, and detergent products. Currently, Bidco is constructing a Sh. 4 billion soft drinks plant in Thika. This is part of a Sh. 20 billion expansion blueprint that will see the company venture into other manufacturing streams. The fruits of these multi-billion investments are jobs that will see hundreds of jobless Kenyans earning a salary every end month irrespective of their political stand.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

Leave a Reply